JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 22, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Súplica, Contra El Auto Proferido Por La Magistrada María Victoria Calle Correa, Que Rechazó La Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Presentada Por El Actor. La Sala Que Observa  Los Argumentos Expuestos Por El Peticionario, No Presentaron Razones Que Sustentaran El Recurso De Súplica Impetrado, Antes Se Hace Manifiesta La Intención Del Demandante De Aceptar Las Consideraciones Efectuadas Por La Magistrada Sustanciadora, Con Base En Las Cuales Rechazó La Demanda.  En Consecuencia Se Decide Negar El Recurso Interpuesto Y, Por Ende, Confirmar La Providencia Impugnada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Improcedencia por no formulación de argumentos
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE
  2. CONFIRMAR el Auto del 2 de septiembre de 2009, proferido por la Magistrada María Victoria Calle Correa, que rechazó la demanda formulada por Luz Marina Espinosa Mejía y Germán Espinosa Mejía contra los artículos 1º y 4º (parciales) del Decreto 1382 de 2000.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.